12th August 2009

What is Constitutional?

Our founding fathers wanted limited government. The plan for government would make it difficult for any person or group to have unlimited power, and make it difficult to get anything done quickly so thought could be given to law. This plan for government was called the Constitution. The Framers of the Constitution listed the powers that they were giving to the federal government and was allowed to do only those “enumerated powers.”

Do you remember that from Public School? THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN TO LIMIT GOVERNMENT. It is a Commie Lib myth that it is a “living breathing document”. Hence, only 27 Amendments.

American History and the Constitution are either 1) not taught, b) not taught correctly, i.e. it’s ancient history and an ancient document, 3) or taught in such a bland and mundane way that no one will remember it. And lets not forget about the indoctrination that comes with the public school system.

http://animal-farm.us/change/indoctrinating-your-children-441

http://animal-farm.us/change/acorn-and-your-children-553

In The Carnegie Reporter, 2005 Larmar Alexander, (R) Tennessee wrote, “…the last several decades have witnessed a sharp decline in the teaching of American history and civics in our public schools… our public schools are not teaching the history and values that are the American ideology. Instead, students hear a watered-down version of our past, and civics is often dropped from the curriculum entirely.”

On August 9, 2006 Katheryn Kilbert wrote in the New York Times, “Americans know more about “The Simpsons” than they do about the First Amendment… Too few Americans, particularly young people, understand our Constitution and the civil rights and liberties that Americans take for granted… Unfortunately, today fewer and fewer college students grapple with the history of the Constitution, its language or meaning. At a time when constitutional issues, from privacy to presidential power, gun control to Guantanamo Bay, confront this nation daily, understanding the Constitution should be the hallmark of citizenship, not its forgotten tradition.”

In 1794, Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia, James Madison stood on the floor of the House to object, “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

Constitutional limits on federal power are explained by James Madison in Federalist Paper No. 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined… be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.”

This is directly out of Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. Article 1, Section 8 explains the LIMITED role of Congress. We’ve let Congress and the Presidents get out of hand. We’ve failed because we don’t understand the Constitution.

Commie libs think the meaning of “general welfare” means that Congress can do just about anything it wants to. Again, this is because of our ignorance of history and the Constitution.

In a letter James Madison wrote to Edmund Pendleton “If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the ‘general welfare’, the government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one …With respect to the two words ‘general welfare’, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter to Pennsylvania Representative Albert Gallatin, “Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated… Whensoever the General Federal Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.”

In a speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, James Madison said, “The powers of the federal government are enumerated; it can only operate in certain cases; it has legislative powers on defined and limited objects, beyond which it cannot extend its jurisdiction”.

Does it sound like our founding fathers wanted an “all encompassing” government? They rebelled against a tyrannical king who was the “all encompassing” government. A government with too much power – the power to take away rights and freedom. A government with power to take away our God-given rights, had to be stopped. And they did it.

They specifically wrote the Constitution to preserve a “separation of powers” and to give specific powers to our federal government. Our Constitution reserves all powers not specifically granted to the federal government are to go respectively to the states and to the people. IT’S IN THE CONSTITUTION! It’s called the 10th Amendment.

“I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that ‘all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.’ To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power not longer susceptible of any definition.” It seems Thomas Jefferson agrees with me in his “Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank”, February 15, 1791

Limited government requires individual responsibility for one’s actions. We are to be responsible for ourselves without dependence upon the government for “hand-outs” or “welfare”. Government should not be, nor should we expect, involvement in “social engineering” nor in the re-distribution of wealth.

Each new law passed is taking of freedom and responsibility from individuals and transferring it to the government and we need to recognize this. Instead of “limited government” we have been subsidizing “unlimited government”.

Benjamin Franklin articulated, “Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”.

And Thomas Paine wrote in Rights of Man, “We still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping at the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised to furnish new pretenses for revenue and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without a tribute”.

I hear Obummer’s a Constitutional lawyer. I’m sure he is, but he defies the Constitution. He relies on the fact that we don’t know the Constitution. He and other Presidents since Woodrow Wilson have expanded government. The stimulus packages, cap-and-trade, and healthcare will increase governments power giving us less freedom. The government is utilizing or creating these crisis’s to scare us into giving them this power. We have to hold out, because when we don’t give in, the lies will unravel.

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 12th, 2009 at 9:10 pm and is filed under Conservative Blog Network, Constitution, Obama, Socialism, Taxes, big government, economy, indoctrination, spending. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 14 responses to “What is Constitutional?”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On August 12th, 2009, tellitlikeitis said:

    Right on the money Foxwood!

  2. 2 On August 12th, 2009, lisaintx said:

    Kick that butt!!! Right on!
    The “Powers that be” WANT American’s to be in a stupefied mindset…that makes stealing our liberties and rights that much easier to accomplish.

  3. 3 On August 13th, 2009, Me Again said:

    Great Post, Blogwood, Love it!!!

    And Thank you! hahaahah

  4. 4 On August 13th, 2009, Libertarian Woman said:

    I have learned more this year about the Constitution and how the government works than I ever did in school. Thanks to Foxwood for your post on my blog which led me here! I will be back.

    As far as Obummer (I like that!) being a Constitutional lawyer, I think you have to know something inside and out in order to twist it to your liking.

    I would say he knows the 2010 elections may just call a stop to his actions, hence the rush to get as much through as possible. The only worry about 2010? Will we get legitimate candidates or RINO’s who are spouting platitudes they think will get our votes.

    Voting them ALL out regardless sounds good! Probably not likely.

  5. 5 On August 13th, 2009, S'marty said:

    Why is it so hard for leftists and their liberal minions to understand the basic tenets of the Constitution? It’s one of the simplest concepts ever developed: small government.

    Thanks for the great read and blog! Keep it up! You now have a new reader. :-)

  6. 6 On August 14th, 2009, arlenearmy said:

    Fox,
    Did you hear Obama telling lies again today at the townhall in Montana. The NRA member told Obama that he believes in the constitution. Obama replied back that he believes in the constitution also. Obama said this to make himself look good.

  7. 7 On August 14th, 2009, arlenearmy said:

    The Obama doubled talked at the townhall when he said that
    1. his Obamacare aint for free
    2. Then he said uninsured folks cant get insurance for nothing
    3. Then he said somebody has to pay for it & its gonna be the folks who make too much money

    If folks who “make too much money” got to pay for those who DONT PAY, then that means SOMEBODY is getting something for FREE. Sort of like spreading the wealth. These are contradictions he made in a single speech. The man’s a pathological liar.

  8. 8 On August 14th, 2009, foxwood said:

    He believes in the Constitution just like Rose believes in the Constitution. Excuse my sarcasm, but the Constitution is the LAW! It is not meant to pick and chose what you want from it. The Constitution in it’s entirety is the LAW of these United States of America, and it really pisses me off that some people take a big hairy dump on it, because it’s not fair, and it was written by “old white men” that took advantage of others, so therefor it deserves to be shit on.

    We’ve made mistakes and have done our best to rectify them, but this is the greatest nation in the world, if Oshithead doesn’t fuck it up. Hopefully in 2010 and 2012 we can fix all of the fuckups.

    Not meaning to offend, Arlene. I live where Conservatism is the norm. I have a feeling that you and I have lived very close to each other the more I talk to you. I know we lived close in Oklahoma, but I’m guessing you’ve live close by in Louisiana also. I just don’t talk to many Commie libs and when I do, they piss me off. I don’t understand the gimme gimme gimme mentality and Rose give off that mentality.

    That’s my rant for the night. I’ll shut up now.

  9. 9 On August 15th, 2009, Karmahd said:

    Control the message from grade one, soon people will not even know how to spell the Constitution, great post Fox

  10. 10 On August 17th, 2009, arlenearmy said:

    Hey, on the matter of the constitution, do you want to see a real stupid ass liberal. I mean, this woman is reallllllllllllllllllly out of space, big time.

  11. 11 On August 17th, 2009, arlenearmy said:

    OK, Foxwood
    Here’s the video of the stupidest person on issues of liberty & the constitution

  12. 12 On August 20th, 2009, Morb said:

    Very interesting read Fox !! … After this , I shall scroll up to your most recent one and check that out as well …

    But just to play Devil’s Advocate here … ( as I agree with much of what you say … and all those quotes … ) Who’s to say that a group of individuals , largely comprised of European immigration ( The ‘ Founding Fathers ‘ ) had it ALL figured out over two centuries ago ?!! …

    As society ‘ evolves ‘ … it becomes more complicated …

    Again … I agree with you completely with the ‘ less Federal ‘ involvement on the people … but who’s to say the individual State can be better equipped to make decisions ? … Further complicated by people who don’t vote , or vote not knowing a rat’s ass about anything in the first place ?!!! ( as you have stated here … )

    As for the best country in the world … that’s open for debate as well …

    Glad I popped in tonight !!
    ~;-)

  13. 13 On August 20th, 2009, foxwood said:

    The founding fathers had provisions to change the Constitution. They made the Constitution hard to change for a reason, they didn’t want an irrational country to change things without thinking about it. The time it takes to make “amendments” give an irrational country time to figure things out.

    What Obutthole and others since the 1900s have done is bypass the Constitution, because they want their way now. The Constitution is law. Government must be greater than law, apparently.

    I would say the founding fathers had it figured out, because they knew freedom was the engine to prosperity. If you consider the most prosperous (for the time being) country in the world was accomplished in less than 250 years, yes I would have to say the United States is the greatest country in the world (again for the time being).

    No other country has come from nothing to a super power in less than 250 years. It was from freedom and prosperity. Some from within our country do not want this. Obutthole is one of them.

  14. 14 On August 21st, 2009, Procrustes said:

    “The founding fathers had provisions to change the Constitution. They made the Constitution hard to change for a reason, they didn’t want an irrational country to change things without thinking about it. The time it takes to make “amendments” give an irrational country time to figure things out.”

    Exactly. We should have learned this lesson in 1920 after our idiot Congress passed the Prohibition amendment. Despite how “tough” it was to get an amendment passed, Congress took a frightfully wrong approach to problem solving by creating new problems in the guise of moralizing. The time, money, and effort spent by our government trying to “clean up” one of the most profitable ventures in all history was an embarrassment, and set us back on the road to progress.

    It can be argued that the #1 reason for our financial inferiority is because of all the money we feed into perpetuating and expanding the government and its self-sustaining programs.

Leave a Reply

Do not flame other comment authors as it is a sure way to not get your comment posted. If you need to vent, Vent Your Spleen here.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Page Hits: 66687