24th April 2009

Connecting the dots…

posted in Change, Obama, big government |

After 9/11, Commie Libs wanted to know why George Bush didn’t connect the dots. Now after the fact they want to imprison Bush, Cheney and Rove, by making interrogation techniques illegal, then retroactively imprison the offenders. It’s like a road that is speed limit is 50mph then today lowing the speed limit to 40 and arresting everyone that drove at 50 last week.

On May 17th, 2002, USA Today wrote that the Bush Administration Failed to ‘connect the dots’. Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska said, “Most people thought we didn’t have a clue. Now it appears we had a clue. We obviously didn’t do enough with it.”

Well, lets see… If a second wave of attacks came, wouldn’t Americans, let alone Commie Libs, want the head of George Bush? So what does the Bush Administration do? They start connecting the dots. They used a lawful method of interrogation (at the time), NOT TORTURE, to extract information and CONNECT THE DOTS!

The water boarding of Al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed produced information that allowed the U.S government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles in 2002. Lives were saved.

So now the Lord and Savior Mohammed Obama is President and all is safe. We don’t have to practice advanced interrogation anymore. As a matter of fact, we can make it illegal. In fact, lets retroactively bring up charges on Bush, Cheaney, Rice, and Rove. It’s unconstitutional, but who cares about the Constitution anymore anyway? Hang em’ all!

Well… I see how it really is… I can ‘connect the dots’… Bush/Cheney are Republicans and they can do no right. If they save lives with legal methods, you’ll make the methods illegal and get them. If they don’t save live and let the bad guys kill Americans, you’ll get them. You don’t care if Americans die or not. You just want Commie Lib Democraps in office. It has nothing to do with saving lives until it comes time to count votes.

Your opening a door you don’t want to open because the retroactive imprisonment door swings both ways. When you lose office, who is next to get their asshole reamed?

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Friday, April 24th, 2009 at 11:33 am and is filed under Change, Obama, big government. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 12 responses to “Connecting the dots…”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On April 24th, 2009, whyowhy said:

    Hello– good post! Thanks for writing about this topic too. There is much to do.

    Regards

  2. 2 On April 25th, 2009, kyle said:

    “50mph then today lowing the speed limit to 40 and arresting everyone that drove at 50 last week.”

    Our country and other civilized countries have always been against torture. So you’re 40 last week and 50 this week doesn’t apply. The ’speed limit’ in this case has always been 50, or at least since WW1.

    Anyway, nice blog even though I don’t agree with any of it. I’ll add it to my normal routine.

  3. 3 On April 25th, 2009, kyle said:

    I forgot to add.. I am against imprisoning members of previous administrations. The liberal left of the party is pushing for that, while most of us aren’t. It’s a horrible practice to begin.

  4. 4 On April 25th, 2009, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton said:

    Good post – it’s a pity more aren’t standing up and saying this and we will assuredly get hit (and worse) again the way our government is handling things…

  5. 5 On April 25th, 2009, VotingFemale said:

    Just back tracking…

    Are you Foxwood who posted on my blog post:

    http://votingfemale.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/obama-cos-torture-witch-hunt-self-damage-will-eclipse-watergate/

    If so it was a cute post!

    Hope you visit again!

  6. 6 On April 25th, 2009, Héctor said:

    To whoever made this post (because there is no name),

    I think we agree that torture is illegal in the United States, which has been stipulated internationally since the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights and domestically under Title 18 of the United States Code.

    I disagree with two assertions made in the post that are not substantiated at all:

    1) that waterboarding is not torture. It is indeed torture because it is intended to drown the victim. It can be qualified as a” simulation,” but such qualification does not negate the feeling of dying it is intended to produce. If it were not torture, the Spanish Inquisition would not have used it. (But those who advocate waterboarding or claim it is a tame technique should try it out themselves.)

    2) that it produced reliable intelligence. To suggest that any type of torture is an effective means of interrogation is absurd. But do not take my word for it. Read what the interrogators and professionals have to say.

    Finally, the suggestion that prosecutions are “retroactive” is false. If waterboarding is torture, then it has always been illegal–because of international and domestic law. No amount of legal rationalization can (or should) protect those who clearly broke the law.

    But you will not agree with me. Instead, you will argue that waterboarding is not torture because that is your only defense. The moment you surrender that position there is no option but to prosecute players of the Bush administration who sanctioned these acts.

  7. 7 On April 25th, 2009, foxwood said:

    Once again… another tune from the 60’s… The Beach Boyz

    Let’s go surfin’ now
    Everybody’s learnin’ how
    Do some waterboardin’ with me!

  8. 8 On April 25th, 2009, foxwood said:

    Hector,

    Your quoting the U N? That’s funny, because we need to pull out and tell them to leave the country anyway.

    1) So what. You disagree with waterboarding as torture. I disagree with you. Again, so what.

    2) Once again I repeat… The waterboarding of Al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed produced information that allowed the U.S government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles in 2002. Lives were saved.

  9. 9 On April 25th, 2009, Héctor said:

    Foxwood, you are providing absolutely no evidence (no links, no references, nothing) that an attack was thwarted. I am providing evidence that waterboarding is torture (see above). I hope you do so in order to actually have a discussion.

  10. 10 On April 26th, 2009, foxwood said:

    Hector,

    “Just words”. Anyone can say anything. I let people find out for themselves by asking them to Google. Anyone can give propaganda. This includes URLs and Google. Let’s say I use Fox news for my for my “evidence”. You’d say, “see there! It’s bullshit”. Hector there would be no changing your mind. Propagate all you want, Hector.

  11. 11 On April 26th, 2009, JD said:

    “Bush/Cheney are Republicans and they can do no right.”

    You stated that correctly.

    Peace…

  12. 12 On April 26th, 2009, foxwood said:

    I certainly bring out the piss in people… :)

Leave a Reply

Do not flame other comment authors as it is a sure way to not get your comment posted. If you need to vent, Vent Your Spleen here.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Page Hits: 197209